The village of Hanging Heaton in West Yorkshire gets its macabre name not from the gallows but from its topographical position on a steep hillside. The village is old, the pinnacled church of St. Paul's is recent - built in the 1820's. The Rev. Stephen Mathews had been vicar there since 1840.
In the summer of 1851, Mr. Mathews had reason to complain to the local magistrates that some lads had been throwing stones at him. In Hanging Heaton, the vicar had been the subject of gossip. - not helped by the fact that his wife and children had moved to York. Worse, however, was the tale told that he had fathered an illegitimate child with a village girl of 16.
His position had become untenable and Mathews was required to attend the Dewsbury magistrates court where Mary Halliwell, "a widow's daughter with pretty features" gave her evidence in a modest manner. As a girl, she'd been taught by Mathews at the village school. As a teenager, she was a "paid teacher." Mary claimed that she and Mathews had been involved for two years, having intercourse on several occasions and she gave birth to their son that May. As was ever the case, Mary Halliwell's innocence was attacked. She indignantly denied being intimate with any other men but there was contrary testimony. Mary was called a "liar and a strumpet." The law required corroboration; without any, the magistrates dismissed the charge. The Rev. Mathews left court, although serenaded with hisses and groans from the dissatisfied public.
The magistrates, as was the custom at the time, included many clergymen. Pressure mounted and the case was called a second time. Some workmen claimed to have seen Mathews and Mary go into the schoolroom and draw the shades. Mary brought to court several gifts she testified receiving from the vicar. Again, the magistrates declined to act.
The dispute had reached far beyond a small village. The Leeds Mercury called the action of the magistrates "perfectly inexplicable." The Rev. Mathews had been with this simple young woman "at unseasonable hours, in unfrequented places and in unseemly familiarity," conduct that was "totally inconsistent with his character as a clergyman and a gentleman."
The Bishop of Ripon, at last, agreed to name a commission of clergymen to review the case and Mathews agreed to refrain from his duties in the meantime. The clerical panel concluded that there was enough evidence to recommend the Bishop to take action. In March 1852, in Ripon Cathedral - Mathews was ruled guilty of the foul crime of adultery and deprived of his incumbency and its emoluments.
Mathews departed Hanging Heaton, leaving his former parish sharply divided. Many still believed him to be innocent of the charge against him. After some clerical inactivity, Mathews found new church employment as a curate in Zeal, Wiltshire. He died in 1866, having been rector of Bartlow in Cambridgeshire.
Clerical Errors - A Victorian Series, Vol II is available here.
 |
| Photograph by Dicky King |
In 1872, the Rev John Goodwin had been five years the vicar of St. Mary's in Moston. It was a new church built to serve a growing working-class suburb out the Oldham Road, northeast of Manchester. The bishop was then pleased to offer Goodwin the vicarage in Denton, a larger parish nearby with a higher salary. But Goodwin hesitated, finally explaining that he could not in conscience accept the appointment owing to scandalous allegations made against him by a married woman in Moston. Although he insisted the charges were totally false, he lost the Denton opportunity. Goodwin was told that he had take legal action to clear his name or face a church enquiry.
The Rev Goodwin was 37 and married, He and his wife Ellen were originally from Leek. In St. Mary's parish, there lived a glass-cutter named Henry Standishstreet, with his wife Mary-Ellen and their four children. Henry, to rise in his trade, needed to improve his numbers and the Rev. Mr. Goodwin had been working with him and, as a result, he spent a lot of time in the Standishstreet home. The clergyman was greatly troubled when a friend came to him to report that Mrs. Standishstreet had been spreading the tale that she and the Rev. Goodwin were carrying on something like a torrid love affair.
Confronted, Henry Standishstreet was profusely apologetic; he simply could not control his wife's tongue. He would publish an apology in the Manchester papers. But no advertisement ever appeared and the Standishstreet family abruptly left Moston. In their absence, the Rev. Goodwin was left to file a slander suit against Mary Ellen Standishstreet.
The case was heard before a special jury at the Liverpool Assizes. Several Moston residents, men and women, related the stories they had been told by Mrs. Standishstreet. She had claimed that first, upon a chance meeting in a country lane, Mr. Goodwin took indecent liberties with her. He begged to be allowed to come to her. The very next day, under the cover of his "tutoring," when her husband was at work and the children were playing below, he called and they went up to the bedroom and committed adultery. A neighbour, John Sykes, a clerk, told the court that Mrs. Standsishtreet began keeping an almanack marked with "ticks" on each day she'd supposedly made love with Mr. Goodwin and, the witness admitted, the markings were numerous. Why would she be saying all this if it wasn't true? Sykes testified that Mrs. Standishtreet had developed an intense dislike of Mrs. Goodwin and her supposed "airs." The vicar's wife was a "proud, stuck up woman" who needed to be brought down and she would be the one to do it.
The Rev. Goodwin took the stand to deny, of course, all the claims made by his absent accuser. He acknowledged that Mrs. Standishtreet had been "spitefully disposed" to his wife for reasons he never quite understood. Because of her false charges, however, he had lost the opportunity for advancement in his clerical career. Mr. Justice Lush denounced the missing defendant, describing the case as among the "most damaging and diabolical slanders" that ever came before him. Though there was no chance that Goodwin would ever see a single farthing, the jury awarded him the hefty sum of £1000 in damages.
Mr. Goodwin's career survived the scandal. The following year, the Bishop of Manchester presented him with the rectory and parish church of All Souls, Manchester. As for the Standishstreets, they can be traced to America, where he found employment in the glass business - with or without any better handle on his sums - in Cambridge near Boston, Massachusetts.
Please consider Clerical Errors, A Victorian Series, Vol. 2.
Thank you.
